toggle visibility
Search within Results:
Display Options:
Number of records found: 61

Select All    Deselect All
 | 
Citations
 | 
   print
Hidden Markov model for atom-counting from sequential ADF STEM images: Methodology, possibilities and limitations”. De wael A, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 219, 113131 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113131
toggle visibility
The atomic lensing model: new opportunities for atom-by-atom metrology of heterogeneous nanomaterials”. van den Bos KHW, Janssens L, De Backer A, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 203, 155 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.12.004
toggle visibility
Hybrid statistics-simulations based method for atom-counting from ADF STEM images”. De wael A, De Backer A, Jones L, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 69 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.010
toggle visibility
Quantification by aberration corrected (S)TEM of boundaries formed by symmetry breaking phase transformations”. Schryvers D, Salje EKH, Nishida M, De Backer A, Idrissi H, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 176, 194 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.022
toggle visibility
How precise can atoms of a nanocluster be located in 3D using a tilt series of scanning transmission electron microscopy images?”.Alania M, De Backer A, Lobato I, Krause FF, Van Dyck D, Rosenauer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 181, 134 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.013
toggle visibility
Depth sectioning combined with atom-counting in HAADF STEM to retrieve the 3D atomic structure”. Alania M, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Lobato I, Bals S, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 36 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.002
toggle visibility
Atom-counting in High Resolution Electron Microscopy: TEM or STEM –, that's the question”. Gonnissen J, De Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 174, 112 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.10.011
toggle visibility
StatSTEM: An efficient approach for accurate and precise model-based quantification of atomic resolution electron microscopy images”. De Backer A, van den Bos KHW, Van den Broek W, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 171, 104 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.08.018
toggle visibility
Detecting and locating light atoms from high-resolution STEM images: The quest for a single optimal design”. Gonnissen J, De Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 170, 128 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.014
toggle visibility
Quantitative STEM normalisation : the importance of the electron flux”. Martinez GT, Jones L, de Backer A, Béché, A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Nellist PD, Ultramicroscopy 159, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.07.010
toggle visibility
Dose limited reliability of quantitative annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy for nano-particle atom-counting”. de Backer A, Martinez GT, MacArthur KE, Jones L, Béché, A, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 151, 56 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.028
toggle visibility
Optimal experimental design for nano-particle atom-counting from high-resolution STEM images”. de Backer A, De wael A, Gonnissen J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 151, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.015
toggle visibility
Atom counting in HAADF STEM using a statistical model-based approach : methodology, possibilities, and inherent limitations”. de Backer A, Martinez GT, Rosenauer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 134, 23 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.003
toggle visibility
High precision measurements of atom column positions using model-based exit wave reconstruction”. de Backer A, Van Aert S, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 111, 1475 (2011). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.07.002
toggle visibility
The effect of probe inaccuracies on the quantitative model-based analysis of high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy images”. Martinez GT, de Backer A, Rosenauer A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Micron 63, 57 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2013.12.009
toggle visibility
Element Specific Atom Counting at the Atomic Scale by Combining High Angle Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X‐ray Spectroscopy”. De Backer A, Zhang Z, van den Bos KHW, Bladt E, Sánchez‐Iglesias A, Liz‐Marzán LM, Nellist PD, Bals S, Van Aert S, Small methods , 2200875 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202200875
toggle visibility
Interface Pattern Engineering in Core‐Shell Upconverting Nanocrystals: Shedding Light on Critical Parameters and Consequences for the Photoluminescence Properties”. Hudry D, De Backer A, Popescu R, Busko D, Howard IA, Bals S, Zhang Y, Pedrazo‐Tardajos A, Van Aert S, Gerthsen D, Altantzis T, Richards BS, Small , 2104441 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202104441
toggle visibility
Quantifying a Heterogeneous Ru Catalyst on Carbon Black Using ADF STEM”. Varambhia AM, Jones L, De Backer A, Fauske VT, Van Aert S, Ozkaya D, Nellist PD, Particle and particle systems characterization 33, 438 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201600067
toggle visibility
de Backer A (2015) Quantitative atomic resolution electron microscopy using advanced statistical techniques. Antwerpen
toggle visibility
Three-dimensional elemental mapping at the atomic scale in bimetallic nanocrystals”. Goris B, de Backer A, Van Aert S, Gómez-Graña S, Liz-Marzán LM, Van Tendeloo G, Bals S, Nano letters 13, 4236 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1021/nl401945b
toggle visibility
Quantitative composition determination at the atomic level using model-based high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy”. Martinez GT, Rosenauer A, de Backer A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 137, 12 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.11.001
toggle visibility
Estimation of unknown structure parameters from high-resolution (S)TEM images : what are the limits?”.den Dekker AJ, Gonnissen J, de Backer A, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 134, 34 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.017
toggle visibility
General conclusions and future perspectives”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 243 (2021).
toggle visibility
Image-quality evaluation and model selection with maximum a posteriori probability”. Fatermans J, de Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 215 (2021).
toggle visibility
Atom column detection”. Fatermans J, de Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 177 (2021).
toggle visibility
Optimal experiment design for nanoparticle atom counting from ADF STEM images”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 145 (2021).
toggle visibility
Atom counting”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 91 (2021).
toggle visibility
Efficient fitting algorithm”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 73 (2021).
toggle visibility
Statistical parameter estimation theory : principles and simulation studies”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 29 (2021).
toggle visibility
Introduction”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 1 (2021).
toggle visibility
Select All    Deselect All
 | 
Citations
 | 
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: