toggle visibility
Search within Results:
Display Options:
Number of records found: 156

Select All    Deselect All
 | 
Citations
 | 
   print
Real space maps of atomic transitions”. Schattschneider P, Verbeeck J, Hamon AL, Ultramicroscopy 109, 781 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.016
toggle visibility
Quantitative STEM normalisation : the importance of the electron flux”. Martinez GT, Jones L, de Backer A, Béché, A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Nellist PD, Ultramicroscopy 159, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.07.010
toggle visibility
Quantitative HAADF STEM of SiGe in presence of amorphous surface layers from FIB preparation”. Grieb T, Tewes M, Schowalter M, Müller-Caspary K, Krause FF, Mehrtens T, Hartmann J-M, Rosenauer A, Ultramicroscopy 184, 29 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2017.09.012
toggle visibility
Quantitative electron tomography : the effect of the three-dimensional point spread function”. Heidari H, van den Broek W, Bals S, Ultramicroscopy 135, 1 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.005
toggle visibility
Quantitative composition determination at the atomic level using model-based high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy”. Martinez GT, Rosenauer A, de Backer A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 137, 12 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.11.001
toggle visibility
Quantitative atomic resolution mapping using high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy”. Van Aert S, Verbeeck J, Erni R, Bals S, Luysberg M, van Dyck D, Van Tendeloo G, Ultramicroscopy 109, 1236 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.05.010
toggle visibility
Quantification of crystalline and amorphous content in porous TiO2 samples from electron energy loss spectroscopy”. Bertoni G, Beyers E, Verbeeck J, Mertens M, Cool P, Vansant EF, Van Tendeloo G, Ultramicroscopy 106, 630 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.03.006
toggle visibility
Quantification by aberration corrected (S)TEM of boundaries formed by symmetry breaking phase transformations”. Schryvers D, Salje EKH, Nishida M, De Backer A, Idrissi H, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 176, 194 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.022
toggle visibility
Prospects for versatile phase manipulation in the TEM : beyond aberration correction”. Guzzinati G, Clark L, Béché, A, Juchtmans R, Van Boxem R, Mazilu M, Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 151, 85 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.007
toggle visibility
Progress and new advances in simulating electron microscopy datasets using MULTEM”. Lobato I, Van Aert S, Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 168, 17 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.06.003
toggle visibility
Precision of three-dimensional atomic scale measurements from HRTEM images : what are the limits?”.Wang A, Van Aert S, Goos P, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 114, 20 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.12.002
toggle visibility
Pore REconstruction and Segmentation (PORES) method for improved porosity quantification of nanoporous materials”. Van Eyndhoven G, Kurttepeli M, van Oers CJ, Cool P, Bals S, Batenburg KJ, Sijbers J, Ultramicroscopy 148, 10 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.08.008
toggle visibility
Plasmon holographic experiments: theoretical framework”. Verbeeck J, van Dyck D, Lichte H, Potapov P, Schattschneider P, Ultramicroscopy 102, 239 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.10.005
toggle visibility
Phase offset method of ptychographic contrast reversal correction”. Hofer C, Gao C, Chennit T, Yuan B, Pennycook TJ, Ultramicroscopy , 113922 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.113922
toggle visibility
Oxidation state and chemical shift investigation in transition metal oxides by EELS”. Tan H, Verbeeck J, Abakumov A, Van Tendeloo G, Ultramicroscopy 116, 24 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.002
toggle visibility
Optimization of NBED simulations for disc-detection measurements”. Grieb T, Krause FF, Mahr C, Zillmann D, Müller-Caspary K, Schowalter M, Rosenauer A, Ultramicroscopy 181, 50 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2017.04.015
toggle visibility
Optimal experimental design of STEM measurement of atom column positions”. Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van Dyck D, van den Bos A, Ultramicroscopy 90, 273 (2002). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00152-8
toggle visibility
Optimal experimental design for nano-particle atom-counting from high-resolution STEM images”. de Backer A, De wael A, Gonnissen J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 151, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.015
toggle visibility
Optimal experiment design for element specific atom counting using multiple annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy detectors”. Sentürk DG, De Backer A, Friedrich T, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 242, 113626 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113626
toggle visibility
Optimal aperture sizes and positions for EMCD experiments”. Verbeeck J, Hébert, Rubino S, Novák P, Rusz J, Houdellier F, Gatel C, Schattschneider P, Ultramicroscopy 108, 865 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.02.007
toggle visibility
On the interpretation of HREM images of partially ordered alloys”. De Meulenaere P, Van Tendeloo G, van Landuyt J, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 60, 265 (1995). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(95)00065-9
toggle visibility
On central focusing for contrast optimization in direct electron ptychography of thick samples”. Gao C, Hofer C, Pennycook TJ, Ultramicroscopy 256, 113879 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2023.113879
toggle visibility
Nonlinear imaging using annular dark field TEM”. Bals S, Kilaas R, Kisielowski C, Ultramicroscopy 104, 281 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.05.004
toggle visibility
Nanowire facilitated transfer of sensitive TEM samples in a FIB”. Gorji S, Kashiwar A, Mantha LS, Kruk R, Witte R, Marek P, Hahn H, Kübel C, Scherer T, Ultramicroscopy 219, 113075 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2020.113075
toggle visibility
MULTEM : a new multislice program to perform accurate and fast electron diffraction and imaging simulations using graphics processing units with CUDA”. Lobato I, Van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 156, 9 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.04.016
toggle visibility
Modelling ADF STEM images using elliptical Gaussian peaks and its effects on the quantification of structure parameters in the presence of sample tilt”. De wael A, De Backer A, Lobato I, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy , 113391 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113391
toggle visibility
Model-based quantification of EELS spectra: treating the effect of correlated noise”. Verbeeck J, Bertoni G, Ultramicroscopy 108, 74 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.03.004
toggle visibility
Model-based quantification of EELS spectra: including the fine structure”. Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Bertoni G, Ultramicroscopy 106, 976 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.006
toggle visibility
Model based quantification of EELS spectra”. Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 101, 207 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.06.004
toggle visibility
Measuring the height-to-height correlation function of corrugation in suspended graphene”. Kirilenko DA, Brunkov PN, Ultramicroscopy 165, 1 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.010
toggle visibility
Select All    Deselect All
 | 
Citations
 | 
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: