|
“The 2022 Plasma Roadmap: low temperature plasma science and technology”. Adamovich I, Agarwal S, Ahedo E, Alves LL, Baalrud S, Babaeva N, Bogaerts A, Bourdon A, Bruggeman PJ, Canal C, Choi EH, Coulombe S, Donkó, Z, Graves DB, Hamaguchi S, Hegemann D, Hori M, Kim H-h, Kroesen GMW, Kushner MJ, Laricchiuta A, Li X, Magin TE, Mededovic Thagard S, Miller V, Murphy AB, Oehrlein GS, Puac N, Sankaran RM, Samukawa S, Shiratani M, Šimek M, Tarasenko N, Terashima K, Thomas Jr E, Trieschmann J, Tsikata S, Turner MM, van der Walt IJ, van de Sanden MCM, von Woedtke T, Journal Of Physics D-Applied Physics 55, 373001 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac5e1c
Abstract: The 2022 Roadmap is the next update in the series of Plasma Roadmaps published by<italic>Journal of Physics</italic>D with the intent to identify important outstanding challenges in the field of low-temperature plasma (LTP) physics and technology. The format of the Roadmap is the same as the previous Roadmaps representing the visions of 41 leading experts representing 21 countries and five continents in the various sub-fields of LTP science and technology. In recognition of the evolution in the field, several new topics have been introduced or given more prominence. These new topics and emphasis highlight increased interests in plasma-enabled additive manufacturing, soft materials, electrification of chemical conversions, plasma propulsion, extreme plasma regimes, plasmas in hypersonics, data-driven plasma science and technology and the contribution of LTP to combat COVID-19. In the last few decades, LTP science and technology has made a tremendously positive impact on our society. It is our hope that this roadmap will help continue this excellent track record over the next 5–10 years.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Plasma Lab for Applications in Sustainability and Medicine – Antwerp (PLASMANT)
Impact Factor: 3.4
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac5e1c
|
|
|
“The 2020 plasma catalysis roadmap”. Bogaerts A, Tu X, Whitehead JC, Centi G, Lefferts L, Guaitella O, Azzolina-Jury F, Kim H-H, Murphy AB, Schneider WF, Nozaki T, Hicks JC, Rousseau A, Thevenet F, Khacef A, Carreon M, Journal Of Physics D-Applied Physics 53, 443001 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab9048
Abstract: Plasma catalysis is gaining increasing interest for various gas conversion applications, such as CO2 conversion into value-added chemicals and fuels, CH4 activation into hydrogen, higher hydrocarbons or oxygenates, and NH3 synthesis. Other applications are already more established, such as for air pollution control, e.g. volatile organic compound remediation, particulate matter and NOx removal. In addition, plasma is also very promising for catalyst synthesis and treatment. Plasma catalysis clearly has benefits over ‘conventional’ catalysis, as outlined in the Introduction. However, a better insight into the underlying physical and chemical processes is crucial. This can be obtained by experiments applying diagnostics, studying both the chemical processes at the catalyst surface and the physicochemical mechanisms of plasma-catalyst interactions, as well as by computer modeling. The key challenge is to design cost-effective, highly active and stable catalysts tailored to the plasma environment. Therefore, insight from thermal catalysis as well as electro- and photocatalysis is crucial. All these aspects are covered in this Roadmap paper, written by specialists in their field, presenting the state-of-the-art, the current and future challenges, as well as the advances in science and technology needed to meet these challenges.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Plasma Lab for Applications in Sustainability and Medicine – Antwerp (PLASMANT)
Impact Factor: 3.4
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9048
|
|
|
“Streamer propagation in a packed bed plasma reactor for plasma catalysis applications”. Wang W, Kim H-H, Van Laer K, Bogaerts A, Chemical engineering journal 334, 2467 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.139
Abstract: A packed bed dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) is widely used for plasma catalysis applications, but the exact plasma characteristics in between the packing beads are far from understood. Therefore, we study here these plasma characteristics by means of fluid modelling and experimental observations using ICCD imaging, for packing materials with different dielectric constants. Our study reveals that a packed bed DBD reactor in dry air at atmospheric pressure may show three types of discharges, i.e. positive restrikes, filamentary microdischarges, which can also be localized between two packing beads, and surface discharges (so-called surface ionization
waves). Restrikes between the dielectric surfaces result in the formation of filamentary microdischarges, while surface charging creates electric field components parallel to the dielectric surfaces, leading to the formation of surface discharges. A transition in discharge mode occurs from surface discharges to local filamentary discharges between the packing beads when the dielectric constant of the packing rises from 5 to 1000. This may have implications for the efficiency of plasma catalytic gas treatment, because the catalyst activation may be limited by constraining the discharge to the contact points of the beads. The production of reactive species occurs most in the positive restrikes, the surface discharges and the local microdischarges in between the beads, and is less significant in the longer filamentary microdischarges. The faster streamer propagation and discharge development with higher dielectric constant of the packing beads leads to a faster production of reactive species. This study is of great interest for plasma catalysis, where packing beads with different dielectric constants are often used as supports for the catalytic materials. It allows us to better understand how different packing materials can influence the performance of packed bed plasma reactors for environmental applications.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Plasma Lab for Applications in Sustainability and Medicine – Antwerp (PLASMANT)
Impact Factor: 6.216
Times cited: 36
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.139
|
|