|
“Catalyst preparation with plasmas : how does it work?”.Wang Z, Zhang Y, Neyts EC, Cao X, Zhang X, Jang BW-L, Liu C-jun, ACS catalysis 8, 2093 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1021/ACSCATAL.7B03723
Abstract: Catalyst preparation with plasmas is increasingly attracting interest. A plasma is a partially ionized gas, consisting of electrons, ions, molecules, radicals, photons, and excited species, which are all active species for catalyst preparation and treatment. Under the influence of plasma, nucleation and crystal growth in catalyst preparation can be very different from those in the conventional thermal approach. Some thermodynamically unfavorable reactions can easily take place with plasmas. Compounds such as sulfides, nitrides, and phosphides that are produced under harsh conditions can be synthesized by plasma under mild conditions. Plasmas can produce catalysts with smaller particle sizes and controllable structure. Plasma is also a facile tool for reduction, oxidation, doping, etching, coating, alloy formation, surface treatment, and surface cleaning in a simple and direct way. A rapid and convenient plasma template removal has thus been established for zeolite synthesis. It can operate at room temperature and allows the catalyst preparation on temperature-sensitive supporting materials. Plasma is typically effective for the production of various catalysts on metallic substrates. In addition, plasma-prepared transition-metal catalysts show enhanced low-temperature activity with improved stability. This provides a useful model catalyst for further improvement of industrial catalysts. In this review, we aim to summarize the recent advances in catalyst preparation with plasmas. The present understanding of plasma-based catalyst preparation is discussed. The challenges and future development are addressed.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Plasma Lab for Applications in Sustainability and Medicine – Antwerp (PLASMANT)
Impact Factor: 10.614
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1021/ACSCATAL.7B03723
|
|
|
“G0W0 band gap of ZnO : effects of plasmon-pole models”. Stankovski M, Antonius G, Waroquiers D, Miglio A, Dixit H, Sankaran K, Giantomassi M, Gonze X, Côté, M, Rignanese G-M, Physical review : B : condensed matter and materials physics 84, 241201 (2011). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.241201
Abstract: Carefully converged calculations are performed for the band gap of ZnO within many-body perturbation theory (G0W0 approximation). The results obtained using four different well-established plasmon-pole models are compared with those of explicit calculations without such models (the contour-deformation approach). This comparison shows that, surprisingly, plasmon-pole models depending on the f-sum rule gives less precise results. In particular, it confirms that the band gap of ZnO is underestimated in the G0W0 approach as compared to experiment, contrary to the recent claim of Shih et al. [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 146401 (2010)].
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Condensed Matter Theory (CMT)
Impact Factor: 3.836
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.241201
|
|
|
“Magnetic field dependence of the exciton energy in a quantum disk”. Janssens KL, Peeters FM, Schweigert VA, Physical review : B : condensed matter and materials physics 63, 205311 (2001). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.205311
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Condensed Matter Theory (CMT)
Impact Factor: 3.836
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.205311
|
|
|
“Bond geometry and phase transition mechanism of H-bonded ferroelectricity”. Bussmann-Holder A, Michel KH, Physical review letters 80, 2173 (1998). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2173
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Condensed Matter Theory (CMT)
Impact Factor: 8.462
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2173
|
|
|
“Role of sputtered Cu atoms and ions in a direct current glow discharge: combined fluid and Monte Carlo model”. Bogaerts A, Gijbels R, Journal of applied physics 79, 1279 (1996). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.361023
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Plasma Lab for Applications in Sustainability and Medicine – Antwerp (PLASMANT)
Impact Factor: 2.183
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1063/1.361023
|
|
|
“Growth mode and electronic-structure of the epitaxial C60(111)/GeS(001) interface”. Gensterblum G, Hevesi K, Han BY, Yu LM, Pireaux JJ, Thiry PA, Caudano R, Lucas AA, Bernaerts D, Amelinckx S, Van Tendeloo G, Bendele G, Buslaps T, Johnson RL, Foss M, Feidenhans’l R, Le Lay G;, Physical review : B : condensed matter and materials physics 50, 11981 (1994). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.11981
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 3.736
Times cited: 81
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.11981
|
|