| Records |
| Author |
Hoogmartens, R.; Eyckmans, J.; Van Passel, S. |
| Title |
A Hotelling model for the circular economy including recycling, substitution and waste accumulation |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
Year  |
2018 |
Publication |
Resources Conservation And Recycling |
Abbreviated Journal |
Resour Conserv Recy |
| Volume |
128 |
Issue |
128 |
Pages |
98-109 |
| Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM) |
| Abstract |
Non-renewable resources include a large variety of deposits that have been formed by geological processes over millions of years. Although extraction of such resources provides benefits as employment and economic revenues, it also contributes to negative environmental externalities and it increases resource scarcity. An important policy question is how to optimally extract non-renewable resource stocks over time while taking possible substitutes and recycling into account. The present paper adds to the literature by developing a generic numerical optimisation model that can be used to simulate non-renewable resource management regimes and the effects of different policy instruments deployed at different stages of the resource's life cycle. By including recycling and substitution, the model extends the seminal cake-eating Hotelling model that dominates the non-renewable resource economics literature. In addition to being generically designed, the model can accommodate for non-competitive market settings, interacting policy instruments and environmental externalities at different stages of the material's life cycle. The model's possibilities are illustrated by means of a numerical simulation example for the extraction of sand. |
| Address |
|
| Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
| Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
| Language |
|
Wos |
000417658500013 |
Publication Date |
2017-10-12 |
| Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
| Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
| ISSN |
0921-3449 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
| Impact Factor |
3.313 |
Times cited |
5 |
Open Access |
|
| Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 3.313 |
| Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:148496 |
Serial |
6142 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Hoogmartens, R.; Eyckmans, J.; Van Passel, S. |
| Title |
Landfill taxes and enhanced waste management : combining valuable practices with respect to future waste streams |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| Year |
2016 |
Publication |
Waste Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
Waste Manage |
| Volume |
55 |
Issue |
|
Pages |
345-354 |
| Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM) |
| Abstract |
Both landfill taxes and Enhanced Waste Management (EWM) practices can mitigate the scarcity issue of landfill capacity by respectively reducing landfilled waste volumes and valorising future waste streams. However, high landfill taxes might erode incentives for EWM, even though EWM creates value by valorising waste. Concentrating on Flanders (Belgium), the paper applies dynamic optimisation modelling techniques to analyse how landfill taxation and EWM can reinforce each other and how taxation schemes can be adjusted in order to foster sustainable and welfare maximising ways of processing future waste streams. Based on the Flemish simulation results, insights are offered that are generally applicable in international waste and resource management policy. As shown, the optimal Flemish landfill tax that optimises welfare in the no EWM scenario is higher than the one in the EWM scenario (93 against (sic)50/ton). This difference should create incentives for applying EWM and is driven by the positive external effects that are generated by EWM practices. In Flanders, as the current landfill tax is slightly lower than these optimal levels, the choice that can be made is to further increase taxation levels or show complete commitment to EWM. A first generally applicable insight that was found points to the fact that it is not necessarily the case that the higher the landfill tax, the more effective waste management improvements can be realised. Other insights are about providing sufficient incentives for applying EMW practices and formulating appropriate pleas in support of technological development. By these insights, this paper should provide relevant information that can assist in triggering the transition towards a resource efficient, circular economy in Europe. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Address |
|
| Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
| Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
| Language |
|
Wos |
000381535200036 |
Publication Date |
2016-04-05 |
| Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
| Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
| ISSN |
0956-053x |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
| Impact Factor |
4.03 |
Times cited |
5 |
Open Access |
|
| Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 4.03 |
| Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:137150 |
Serial |
6222 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Dubois, M.; Hoogmartens, R.; Van Passel, S.; Van Acker, K.; Vanderreydt, I. |
| Title |
Innovative market-based policy instruments for waste management : a case study on shredder residues in Belgium |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| Year |
2015 |
Publication |
Waste Management & Research |
Abbreviated Journal |
Waste Manage Res |
| Volume |
33 |
Issue |
10 |
Pages |
886-893 |
| Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics; Engineering Management (ENM) |
| Abstract |
In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs. |
| Address |
|
| Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
| Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
| Language |
|
Wos |
000361818000004 |
Publication Date |
2015-09-22 |
| Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
| Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
| ISSN |
0734-242x; 1096-3669 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record |
| Impact Factor |
1.803 |
Times cited |
1 |
Open Access |
|
| Notes |
; The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research has been funded by the Flemish Government through the policy research centres programme. ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 1.803; 2015 IF: 1.297 |
| Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:129876 |
Serial |
6217 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Hoogmartens, R.; Van Passel, S.; Van Acker, K.; Dubois, M. |
| Title |
Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| Year |
2014 |
Publication |
Environmental Impact Assessment Review |
Abbreviated Journal |
Environ Impact Asses |
| Volume |
48 |
Issue |
|
Pages |
27-33 |
| Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics; Engineering Management (ENM) |
| Abstract |
Increasing interest in sustainability has led to the development of sustainability assessment tools such as Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). Due to methodological disparity of these three tools, conflicting assessment results generate confusion for many policy and business decisions. In order to interpret and integrate assessment results, the paper provides a framework that clarifies the connections and coherence between the included assessment methodologies. Building on this framework, the paper further focuses on key aspects to adapt any of the methodologies to full sustainability assessments. Aspects dealt with in the review are for example the reported metrics, the scope, data requirements, discounting, product- or project-related and approaches with respect to scarcity and labor requirements. In addition to these key aspects, the review shows that important connections exist: (i) the three tools can cope with social inequality, (ii) processes such as valuation techniques for LCC and CBA are common, (iii) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is used as input in both LCA and CBA and (iv) LCA can be used in parallel with LCC. Furthermore, the most integrated sustainability approach combines elements of LCA and LCC to achieve the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). The key aspects and the connections referred to in the review are illustrated with a case study on the treatment of end-of-life automotive glass. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Address |
|
| Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
| Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
| Language |
|
Wos |
000340141900004 |
Publication Date |
2014-05-23 |
| Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
| Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
| ISSN |
0195-9255 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
| Impact Factor |
3.094 |
Times cited |
93 |
Open Access |
|
| Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 3.094; 2014 IF: 2.400 |
| Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:127542 |
Serial |
6163 |
| Permanent link to this record |
