|
|
“Measuring porosity at the nanoscale by quantitative electron tomography”. Biermans E, Molina L, Batenburg KJ, Bals S, Van Tendeloo G, Nano letters 10, 5014 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1021/nl103172r
Abstract: Quantitative electron tomography is proposed to characterize porous materials at a nanoscale. To achieve reliable three-dimensional (3D) quantitative information, the influence of missing wedge artifacts and segmentation methods is investigated. We are presenting the Discrete Algebraic Reconstruction Algorithm as the most adequate tomography method to measure porosity at the nanoscale. It provides accurate 3D quantitative information, regardless the presence of a missing wedge. As an example, we applied our approach to nanovoids in La2Zr2O7 thin films.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 12.712
Times cited: 79
DOI: 10.1021/nl103172r
|
|
|
|
“DART explained: how to carry out a discrete tomography reconstruction”. Batenburg KJ, Bals S, Sijbers J, Van Tendeloo G, , 295 (2008)
Keywords: P1 Proceeding; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
|
|
|
|
“Reliable pore-size measurements based on a procedure specifically designed for electron tomography measurements of nanoporous samples”. Van Eyndhoven G, Batenburg KJ, van Oers C, Kurttepeli M, Bals S, Cool P, Sijbers J, (2014)
Keywords: P3 Proceeding; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab; Laboratory of adsorption and catalysis (LADCA)
|
|
