Home | << 1 >> |
“Charge Localization and Magnetic Correlations in the Refined Structure of U3O7”. Leinders G, Baldinozzi G, Ritter C, Saniz R, Arts I, Lamoen D, Verwerft M, Inorganic Chemistry 60, 10550 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01212
Abstract: Atomic arrangements in the mixed-valence oxide U3O7 are refined from high-resolution neutron scattering data. The crystallographic model describes a long-range structural order in a U60O140 primitive cell (space group P42/n) containing distorted cuboctahedral oxygen clusters. By combining experimental data and electronic structure calculations accounting for spin–orbit interactions, we provide robust evidence of an interplay between charge localization and the magnetic moments carried by the uranium atoms. The calculations predict U3O7 to be a semiconducting solid with a band gap of close to 0.32 eV, and a more pronounced charge-transfer insulator behavior as compared to the well-known Mott insulator UO2. Most uranium ions (56 out of 60) occur in 9-fold and 10-fold coordinated environments, surrounding the oxygen clusters, and have a tetravalent (24 out of 60) or pentavalent (32 out of 60) state. The remaining uranium ions (4 out of 60) are not contiguous to the oxygen cuboctahedra and have a very compact, 8-fold coordinated environment with two short (2 × 1.93(3) Å) “oxo-type” bonds. The higher Hirshfeld charge and the diamagnetic character point to a hexavalent state for these four uranium ions. Hence, the valence state distribution corresponds to 24/60 × U(IV) + 32/60 U(V) + 4/60 U(VI). The tetravalent and pentavalent uranium ions are predicted to carry noncollinear magnetic moments (with amplitudes of 1.6 and 0.8 μB, respectively), resulting in canted ferromagnetic order in characteristic layers within the overall fluorite-related structure.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 4.857
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01212
Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles
|
“Charge order, frustration relief, and spin-orbit coupling in U3O8”. Saniz R, Baldinozzi G, Arts I, Lamoen D, Leinders G, Verwerft M, Physical review materials 7, 054410 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.054410
Abstract: Research efforts on the description of the low-temperature magnetic order and electronic properties of U3O8 have been inconclusive so far. Reinterpreting neutron scattering results, we use group representation theory to show that the ground state presents collinear out-of-plane magnetic moments, with antiferromagnetic coupling both in-layer and between layers. Charge order relieves the initial geometric frustration, generating a slightly distorted honeycomb sublattice with Néel-type order. The precise knowledge of the characteristics of this magnetic ground state is then used to explain the fine features of the band gap. In this system, spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is of critical importance, as it strongly affects the electronic structure, narrowing the gap by ∼38%, compared to calculations neglecting SOC. The predicted electronic structure actually explains the salient features of recent optical absorption measurements, further demonstrating the excellent agreement between the calculated ground state properties and experiment.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 3.4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.054410
Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record
|
“Refinement of the uranium dispersion corrections from anomalous diffraction”. Leinders G, Grendal OG, Arts I, Bes R, Prozheev I, Orlat S, Fitch A, Kvashnina K, Verwerft M, Journal of applied crystallography 57, 284 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576723010889
Abstract: The evolution of the uranium chemical state in uranium compounds, principally in the oxides, is of concern in the context of nuclear fuel degradation under storage and repository conditions, and in accident scenarios. The U–O system shows complicated phase relations between single-valence uranium dioxide (UO<sub>2</sub>) and different mixed-valence compounds (<italic>e.g.</italic>U<sub>4</sub>O<sub>9</sub>, U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7</sub>and U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>). To try resolving the electronic structure associated with unique atomic positions, a combined application of diffraction and spectroscopic techniques, such as diffraction anomalous fine structure (DAFS), can be considered. Reported here is the application of two newly developed routines for assessing a DAFS data set, with the aim of refining the uranium X-ray dispersion corrections. High-resolution anomalous diffraction data were acquired from polycrystalline powder samples of UO<sub>2</sub>(containing tetravalent uranium) and potassium uranate (KUO<sub>3</sub>, containing pentavalent uranium) using synchrotron radiation in the vicinity of the U<italic>L</italic><sub>3</sub>edge (17.17 keV). Both routines are based on an iterative refinement of the dispersion corrections, but they differ in either using the intensity of a selection of reflections or doing a full-pattern (Rietveld method) refinement. The uranium dispersion corrections obtained using either method are in excellent agreement with each other, and they show in great detail the chemical shifts and differences in fine structure expected for tetravalent and pentavalent uranium. This approach may open new possibilities for the assessment of other, more complicated, materials such as mixed-valence compounds. Additionally, the DAFS methodology can offer a significant resource optimization because each data set contains both structural (diffraction) and chemical (spectroscopy) information, which can avoid the requirement to use multiple experimental stations at synchrotron sources.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 6.1
DOI: 10.1107/S1600576723010889
Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record
|
“Ab initio study of the adsorption of O, O2, H2O and H2O2 on UO2 surfaces using DFT+U and non-collinear magnetism”. Arts I, Saniz R, Baldinozzi G, Leinders G, Verwerft M, Lamoen D, Journal of Nuclear Materials 599, 155249 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155249
Abstract: In order to model correctly the corrosion of spent nuclear fuel under disposal conditions, it is important to understand its behavior in the presence of oxidants. To advance in this direction, we consider the oxidation of UO2. We investigate computationally the adsorption of various species on its three most stable surfaces: (111), (110), and (100), with emphasis on incorporating a full non-collinear PBE+U approach. Various species, namely O, O2, H2O and H2O2 are considered due to their relevance for the oxidation of UO2. The dissociation energy and an estimate for the dissociation barrier for O2 were obtained, using the preferred adsorption configurations of O and O2. The adsorption configurations for H2O in our study compare well with previous studies that used collinear approximations, both in terms of relative stability of configurations and bond lengths. Differences in adsorption energies were found, which may be important for reaction kinetics. Dissociative reactions in which the water molecule splits in hydrogen and hydroxyl occur only on one of the three surfaces. The hydrogen further reacts with a surface oxygen to also form a hydroxyl group. Not surprisingly, we find that H2O2 binds more strongly to the three surfaces than water (lower formation energy), and similar to H2O adsorption, dissociative reactions may occur. The dissociated hydrogen reacts with a surface oxygen to form a hydroxyl group and the hydroperoxyl molecule binds with a surface uranium. Our study, which includes a detailed study of electron transfer, magnetic structure and the preferred adsorption configurations, gives insight into the uranium oxidation states and the influence of surface geometry on adsorption. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the early stages of UO2 oxidation.
Keywords: A1 Journal Article; Electron Microscopy for Materials Science (EMAT) ;
Impact Factor: 3.1
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155249
Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record; WoS full record
|