Number of records found: 61
 | 
Citations
 | 
   web
Depth sectioning combined with atom-counting in HAADF STEM to retrieve the 3D atomic structure”. Alania M, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Lobato I, Bals S, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 36 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.002
toggle visibility
How precise can atoms of a nanocluster be located in 3D using a tilt series of scanning transmission electron microscopy images?”.Alania M, De Backer A, Lobato I, Krause FF, Van Dyck D, Rosenauer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 181, 134 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.013
toggle visibility
Hybrid statistics-simulations based method for atom-counting from ADF STEM images”. De wael A, De Backer A, Jones L, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 69 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.010
toggle visibility
Quantification by aberration corrected (S)TEM of boundaries formed by symmetry breaking phase transformations”. Schryvers D, Salje EKH, Nishida M, De Backer A, Idrissi H, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 176, 194 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.022
toggle visibility
The atomic lensing model: new opportunities for atom-by-atom metrology of heterogeneous nanomaterials”. van den Bos KHW, Janssens L, De Backer A, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 203, 155 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.12.004
toggle visibility
Modelling ADF STEM images using elliptical Gaussian peaks and its effects on the quantification of structure parameters in the presence of sample tilt”. De wael A, De Backer A, Lobato I, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy , 113391 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113391
toggle visibility
Three Approaches for Representing the Statistical Uncertainty on Atom-Counting Results in Quantitative ADF STEM”. De wael A, De Backer A, Yu C-P, Sentürk DG, Lobato I, Faes C, Van Aert S, Microscopy and microanalysis , 1 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622012284
toggle visibility
Recent Advances in Transmission Electron Microscopy for Materials Science at the EMAT Lab of the University of Antwerp”. Guzzinati G, Altantzis T, Batuk M, De Backer A, Lumbeeck G, Samaee V, Batuk D, Idrissi H, Hadermann J, Van Aert S, Schryvers D, Verbeeck J, Bals S, Materials 11, 1304 (2018). http://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081304
toggle visibility
Hidden Markov model for atom-counting from sequential ADF STEM images: Methodology, possibilities and limitations”. De wael A, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 219, 113131 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113131
toggle visibility
Optimal experiment design for element specific atom counting using multiple annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy detectors”. Sentürk DG, De Backer A, Friedrich T, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 242, 113626 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113626
toggle visibility
A decade of atom-counting in STEM: From the first results toward reliable 3D atomic models from a single projection”. De Backer A, Bals S, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy , 113702 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113702
toggle visibility
Fast generation of calculated ADF-EDX scattering cross-sections under channelling conditions”. Zhang Z, Lobato I, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Nellist P, Ultramicroscopy 246, 113671 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113671
toggle visibility
Real-time simulations of ADF STEM probe position-integrated scattering cross-sections for single element fcc crystals in zone axis orientation using a densely connected neural network”. Lobato I, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 251, 113769 (2023). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113769
toggle visibility
Atom counting from a combination of two ADF STEM images”. Şentürk DG, Yu CP, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 255, 113859 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113859
toggle visibility
Element specific atom counting for heterogeneous nanostructures: Combining multiple ADF STEM images for simultaneous thickness and composition determination”. Şentürk DG, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 259, 113941 (2024). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.113941
toggle visibility
The effect of probe inaccuracies on the quantitative model-based analysis of high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy images”. Martinez GT, de Backer A, Rosenauer A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Micron 63, 57 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2013.12.009
toggle visibility
de Backer A (2015) Quantitative atomic resolution electron microscopy using advanced statistical techniques. Antwerpen
toggle visibility
Quantitative annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy for nanoparticle atom-counting: What are the limits?”.De Backer A, De Wael A, Gonnissen J, Martinez GT, Béché, A, MacArthur KE, Jones L, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Journal of physics : conference series 644Electron Microscopy and Analysis Group Conference (EMAG), JUN 02-JUL 02, 2015, Manchester, ENGLAND, 012034 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/644/1/012034
toggle visibility
Quantitative annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy for nanoparticle atom-counting : what are the limits?”.de Backer A, De wael A, Gonnissen J, Martinez GT, Béché, A, MacArthur KE, Jones L, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Journal of physics : conference series 644, 012034 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/644/012034
toggle visibility
StatSTEM: An efficient program for accurate and precise model-based quantification of atomic resolution electron microscopy images”. De Backer A, van den Bos KHW, Van den Broek W, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Journal of physics : conference series T2 –, Electron Microscopy and Analysis Group Conference 2017 (EMAG2017), 3-6 July 2017, Manchester, UK 902, 012013 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/902/1/012013
toggle visibility
Recent breakthroughs in scanning transmission electron microscopy of small species”. van den Bos KHW, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Bals S, Advances in Physics: X 3, 1480420 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2018.1480420
toggle visibility
Atom column detection”. Fatermans J, de Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 177 (2021).
toggle visibility
Atom counting”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 91 (2021).
toggle visibility
Efficient fitting algorithm”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 73 (2021).
toggle visibility
General conclusions and future perspectives”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 243 (2021).
toggle visibility
Image-quality evaluation and model selection with maximum a posteriori probability”. Fatermans J, de Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 215 (2021).
toggle visibility
Introduction”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 1 (2021).
toggle visibility
Optimal experiment design for nanoparticle atom counting from ADF STEM images”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 145 (2021).
toggle visibility
Statistical parameter estimation theory : principles and simulation studies”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 29 (2021).
toggle visibility
Experimental reconstructions of 3D atomic structures from electron microscopy images using a Bayesian genetic algorithm”. De Backer A, Van Aert S, Faes C, Arslan Irmak E, Nellist PD, Jones L, N P J Computational Materials 8, 216 (2022). http://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00900-w
toggle visibility