Number of records found: 188
 | 
Citations
 | 
   web
Is atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy able to resolve and refine amorphous structures?”.van Dyck D, Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van den Bos A, Ultramicroscopy 98, 27 (2003). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00023-8
toggle visibility
Statistical parameter estimation theory : principles and simulation studies”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 29 (2021).
toggle visibility
Estimation of unknown structure parameters from high-resolution (S)TEM images : what are the limits?”.den Dekker AJ, Gonnissen J, de Backer A, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 134, 34 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.017
toggle visibility
Depth sectioning combined with atom-counting in HAADF STEM to retrieve the 3D atomic structure”. Alania M, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Lobato I, Bals S, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 36 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.002
toggle visibility
Optimal experimental design for nano-particle atom-counting from high-resolution STEM images”. de Backer A, De wael A, Gonnissen J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 151, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.015
toggle visibility
Quantitative STEM normalisation : the importance of the electron flux”. Martinez GT, Jones L, de Backer A, Béché, A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Nellist PD, Ultramicroscopy 159, 46 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.07.010
toggle visibility
An alternative approach to determine attainable resolution directly from HREM images”. Wang A, Turner S, Van Aert S, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 133, 50 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.05.008
toggle visibility
Three-dimensional reconstruction of a nanoparticle at atomic resolution”. Batenburg J, Van Aert S, ERCIM news 86, 52 (2011)
toggle visibility
Monitoring oxygen production on mass-selected iridium–tantalum oxide electrocatalysts”. Zheng Y-R, Vernieres J, Wang Z, Zhang K, Hochfilzer D, Krempl K, Liao T-W, Presel F, Altantzis T, Fatermans J, Scott SB, Secher NM, Moon C, Liu P, Bals S, Van Aert S, Cao A, Anand M, Nørskov JK, Kibsgaard J, Chorkendorff I, Nature Energy (2021). http://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00948-w
toggle visibility
Dose limited reliability of quantitative annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy for nano-particle atom-counting”. de Backer A, Martinez GT, MacArthur KE, Jones L, Béché, A, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 151, 56 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.028
toggle visibility
The effect of probe inaccuracies on the quantitative model-based analysis of high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy images”. Martinez GT, de Backer A, Rosenauer A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Micron 63, 57 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2013.12.009
toggle visibility
Nano- and microcrystal investigations of precipitates, interfaces and strain fields in Ni-Ti-Nb by various TEM techniques”. Schryvers D, Shi H, Martinez GT, Van Aert S, Frenzel J, Van Humbeeck J, Materials science forum T2 –, 9th European Symposium on Martensitic Transformations (ESOMAT 2012), SEP 09-16, 2012, St Petersburg, RUSSIA 738/739, 65 (2013). http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.738-739.65
toggle visibility
Hybrid statistics-simulations based method for atom-counting from ADF STEM images”. De wael A, De Backer A, Jones L, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 177, 69 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.010
toggle visibility
Advanced electron crystallography through model-based imaging”. Van Aert S, De Backer A, Martinez GT, den Dekker AJ, Van Dyck D, Bals S, Van Tendeloo G, IUCrJ 3, 71 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252515019727
toggle visibility
Efficient fitting algorithm”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 73 (2021).
toggle visibility
Locating light and heavy atomic column positions with picometer precision using ISTEM”. van den Bos KHW, Krause FF, Béché, A, Verbeeck J, Rosenauer A, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 172, 75 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.10.003
toggle visibility
Direct structure inversion from exit waves : part 2 : a practical example”. Wang A, Chen FR, Van Aert S, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 116, 77 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.011
toggle visibility
The maximum a posteriori probability rule for atom column detection from HAADF STEM images”. Fatermans J, Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, Ultramicroscopy 201, 81 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.003
toggle visibility
Maximum likelihood estimation of structure parameters from high resolution electron microscopy images: part 1: a theoretical framework”. den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S, van den Bos A, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 104, 83 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.001
toggle visibility
Thickness dependence of scattering cross-sections in quantitative scanning transmission electron microscopy”. Martinez GT, van den Bos KHW, Alania M, Nellist PD, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 187, 84 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2018.01.005
toggle visibility
Site occupation of Nb atoms in ternary Ni-Ti-Nb shape memory alloys”. Shi H, Frenzel J, Martinez GT, Van Rompaey S, Bakulin A, Kulkova A, Van Aert S, Schryvers D, Acta materialia 74, 85 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.062
toggle visibility
Atom counting”. de Backer A, Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S Advances in imaging and electron physics T2 – Advances in imaging and electron physics. page 91 (2021).
toggle visibility
Comparison of first moment STEM with conventional differential phase contrast and the dependence on electron dose”. Müller-Caspary K, Krause FF, Winkler F, Béché, A, Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Rosenauer A, Ultramicroscopy 203, 95 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2018.12.018
toggle visibility
The benefits of statistical parameter estimation theory for quantitative interpretation of electron microscopy data”. Van Aert S, Bals S, Chang LY, den Dekker AJ, Kirkland AI, Van Dyck D, Van Tendeloo G Springer, Berlin, page 97 (2008).
toggle visibility
StatSTEM: An efficient approach for accurate and precise model-based quantification of atomic resolution electron microscopy images”. De Backer A, van den Bos KHW, Van den Broek W, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 171, 104 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.08.018
toggle visibility
High resolution electron tomography”. Bals S, Van Aert S, Van Tendeloo G, Current opinion in solid state and materials science 17, 107 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2013.03.001
toggle visibility
Maximum likelihood estimation of structure parameters from high resolution electron microscopy images : part 2 : a practical example”. Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van den Bos A, van Dyck D, Chen JH, Ultramicroscopy 104, 107 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.002
toggle visibility
Atom-counting in High Resolution Electron Microscopy: TEM or STEM –, that's the question”. Gonnissen J, De Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 174, 112 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.10.011
toggle visibility
Getting the best from an imperfect detector : an alternative normalisation procedure for quantitative HAADF STEM”. Jones L, Martinez GT, Béché, A, Van Aert S, Nellist PD, Microscopy and microanalysis 20, 126 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927614002359
toggle visibility
Detecting and locating light atoms from high-resolution STEM images: The quest for a single optimal design”. Gonnissen J, De Backer A, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 170, 128 (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.07.014
toggle visibility