Records |
Author |
Van Passel, S.; Van Huylenbroeck, G.; Lauwers, L.; Mathijs, E. |
Title |
Sustainable value assessment of farms using frontier efficiency benchmarks |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
Year |
2009 |
Publication |
Journal Of Environmental Management |
Abbreviated Journal |
J Environ Manage |
Volume |
90 |
Issue |
10 |
Pages ![sorted by First Page field, descending order (down)](img/sort_desc.gif) |
3057-3069 |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics |
Abstract |
Appropriate assessment of firm sustainability facilitates actor-driven processes towards sustainable development. The methodology in this paper builds further on two proven methodologies for the assessment of sustainability performance: it combines the sustainable value approach with frontier efficiency benchmarks. The sustainable value methodology tries to relate firm performance to the use of different resources. This approach assesses contributions to corporate sustainability by comparing firm resource productivity with the resource productivity of a benchmark, and this for all resources considered. The efficiency is calculated by estimating the production frontier indicating the maximum feasible production possibilities. In this research, the sustainable value approach is combined with efficiency analysis methods to benchmark sustainability assessment. In this way, the production theoretical underpinnings of efficiency analysis enrich the sustainable value approach. The methodology is presented using two different functional forms: the CobbDouglas and the translog functional forms. The simplicity of the CobbDouglas functional form as benchmark is very attractive but it lacks flexibility. The translog functional form is more flexible but has the disadvantage that it requires a lot of data to avoid estimation problems. Using frontier methods for deriving firm specific benchmarks has the advantage that the particular situation of each company is taken into account when assessing sustainability. Finally, we showed that the methodology can be used as an integrative sustainability assessment tool for policy measures. |
Address |
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
Language |
|
Wos |
000269022800013 |
Publication Date |
2009-06-24 |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
ISSN |
0301-4797 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
Impact Factor |
4.01 |
Times cited |
41 |
Open Access |
|
Notes |
|
Approved |
Most recent IF: 4.01; 2009 IF: 2.367 |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:136762 |
Serial |
6259 |
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
Author |
Biely, K.; Mathijs, E.; Van Passel, S. |
Title |
Causal loop diagrams to systematically analyze market power in the Belgian sugar value chain |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
Year |
2019 |
Publication |
AIMS Agriculture and Food |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
Volume |
4 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages ![sorted by First Page field, descending order (down)](img/sort_desc.gif) |
711-730 |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM) |
Abstract |
It has been acknowledged that power is a fundamental aspect that needs to be considered when performing a value chain analysis. The structure of the value chain is indicative of the power distribution along the chain. By employing systems thinking the structure of the value chain can be further investigated and inferences on market power issues can be made. This novel approach connects value chain research with insights from Industrial Organization (IO) literature. Depending on the case, market power may not be measurable by traditional economic tools. Systems thinking offers an alternative tool, allowing the employment of qualitative and quantitative data, overcoming drawbacks of IO methods and providing more depth to value chain analysis. In this paper the valuable contribution of systems thinking to market power analysis is exemplified by the Belgian sugar beet case. The analysis showed that transportability and perishability of sugar beet are key causes of market failure in the Belgian sugar value chain. Systems thinking can support understanding potential future behavior of the market based on the thorough understanding of the current market structure. We illustrate how to integrate factors determining the market structure into causal loop diagrams. This novel approach allows a comprehensive evaluation and thus opens up market power analysis to interdisciplinary research. |
Address |
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
Language |
|
Wos |
000488251600014 |
Publication Date |
2019-08-09 |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
ISSN |
2471-2086 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record |
Impact Factor |
|
Times cited |
|
Open Access |
|
Notes |
; This research was performed within the frame of the EU's HORIZON 2020 project SUFISA with the grant agreement number 635577. The authors want to thank colleagues from the SUFISA project for stimulating and inspiring discussions on this topic. ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: NA |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:163833 |
Serial |
6165 |
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
Author |
Van Passel, S.; Nevens, F.; Mathijs, E.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. |
Title |
Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
Year |
2007 |
Publication |
Ecological Economics |
Abbreviated Journal |
Ecol Econ |
Volume |
62 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages ![sorted by First Page field, descending order (down)](img/sort_desc.gif) |
149-161 |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics |
Abstract |
A major objective of European agricultural policy is to have a sustainable and efficient farming sector that is applying environmentally-friendly production methods. Policy makers aim to combine a strong economic performance and a sustainable use of natural resources. Therefore, it is important to measure and to assess farm sustainability. For a large dataset of Flemish dairy farms, a valuation method that is based on the concept of opportunity costs is used to calculate and analyze differences among the sample farms with respect to the creation of sustainable value. But more important than measuring the creation of sustainable value is to analyze differences in sustainable efficiency. Therefore, sustainable efficiency measures are calculated and differences in sustainable efficiency are explained. Using panel data, an effect model captures the determinants of sustainable efficiency of the studied farms. The empirical model shows that, in general, larger farms have a higher sustainable efficiency. Also farmer's age and dependency on support payments proved to be determining characteristics for observed differences in sustainable efficiency. |
Address |
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
Language |
|
Wos |
000246021800015 |
Publication Date |
2006-07-22 |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
ISSN |
0921-8009; 1873-6106 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
Impact Factor |
2.965 |
Times cited |
101 |
Open Access |
|
Notes |
|
Approved |
Most recent IF: 2.965; 2007 IF: 1.549 |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:136767 |
Serial |
6226 |
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
Author |
Ang, F.; Van Passel, S.; Mathijs, E. |
Title |
An aggregate resource efficiency perspective on sustainability : a sustainable value application to the EU-15 countries |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
Year |
2011 |
Publication |
Ecological Economics |
Abbreviated Journal |
Ecol Econ |
Volume |
71 |
Issue |
|
Pages ![sorted by First Page field, descending order (down)](img/sort_desc.gif) |
99-110 |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics |
Abstract |
The Sustainable Value approach integrates the efficiency with regard to environmental, social and economic resources into a monetary indicator. It gained significant popularity as evidenced by diverse applications at the corporate level. However, its introduction as a measure adhering to the strong sustainability paradigm sparked an ardent debate. This study explores its validity as a macroeconomic strong sustainability measure by applying the Sustainable Value approach to the EU-15 countries. Concretely, we assessed environmental, social and economic resources in combination with the GDP for all EU-15 countries from 1995 to 2006 for three benchmark alternatives. The results show that several countries manage to adequately delink resource use from GDP growth. Furthermore, the remarkable difference in outcome between the national and EU-15 benchmark indicates a possible inefficiency of the current allocation of national resource ceilings imposed by the European institutions. Additionally, by using an effects model we argue that the service degree of the economy and governmental expenditures on social protection and research and development are important determinants of overall resource efficiency. Finally, we sketch out three necessary conditions to link the Sustainable Value approach to the strong sustainability paradigm. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Address |
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
Language |
|
Wos |
000297396700011 |
Publication Date |
2011-09-28 |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
ISSN |
0921-8009; 1873-6106 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
Impact Factor |
2.965 |
Times cited |
12 |
Open Access |
|
Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 2.965; 2011 IF: 2.713 |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:127560 |
Serial |
6151 |
Permanent link to this record |