|
“Automatic correction of nonlinear damping effects in HAADF-STEM tomography for nanomaterials of discrete compositions”. Zhong Z, Aveyard R, Rieger B, Bals S, Palenstijn WJ, Batenburg KJ, Ultramicroscopy 184, 57 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2017.10.013
Abstract: <script type='text/javascript'>document.write(unpmarked('HAADF-STEM tomography is a common technique for characterizing the three-dimensional morphology of nanomaterials. In conventional tomographic reconstruction algorithms, the image intensity is assumed to be a linear projection of a physical property of the specimen. However, this assumption of linearity is not completely valid due to the nonlinear damping of signal intensities. The nonlinear damping effects increase w.r.t the specimen thickness and lead to so-called \u0022cupping artifacts\u0022, due to a mismatch with the linear model used in the reconstruction algorithm. Moreover, nonlinear damping effects can strongly limit the applicability of advanced reconstruction approaches such as Total Variation Minimization and discrete tomography. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for automatically correcting the nonlinear effects and the subsequent cupping artifacts. It is applicable to samples in which chemical compositions can be segmented based on image gray levels. The correction is realized by iteratively estimating the nonlinear relationship between projection intensity and sample thickness, based on which the projections are linearized. The correction and reconstruction algorithms are tested on simulated and experimental data. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.'));
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 8
DOI: 10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2017.10.013
|
|
|
“Strain analysis from nano-beam electron diffraction : influence of specimen tilt and beam convergence”. Grieb T, Krause FF, Schowalter M, Zillmann D, Sellin R, Müller-Caspary K, Mahr C, Mehrtens T, Bimberg D, Rosenauer A, Ultramicroscopy 190, 45 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2018.03.013
Abstract: Strain analyses from experimental series of nano-beam electron diffraction (NBED) patterns in scanning transmission electron microscopy are performed for different specimen tilts. Simulations of NBED series are presented for which strain analysis gives results that are in accordance with experiment. This consequently allows to study the relation between measured strain and actual underlying strain. A two-tilt method which can be seen as lowest-order electron beam precession is suggested and experimentally implemented. Strain determination from NBED series with increasing beam convergence is performed in combination with the experimental realization of a probe-forming aperture with a cross inside. It is shown that using standard evaluation techniques, the influence of beam convergence on spatial resolution is lower than the influence of sharp rings around the diffraction disc which occur at interfaces and which are caused by the tails of the intensity distribution of the electron probe. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 1
DOI: 10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2018.03.013
|
|
|
“Exploring possibilities of band gap measurement with off-axis EELS in TEM”. Korneychuk S, Partoens B, Guzzinati G, Ramaneti R, Derluyn J, Haenen K, Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 189, 76 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2018.03.021
Abstract: A technique to measure the band gap of dielectric materials with high refractive index by means of energy electron loss spectroscopy (EELS) is presented. The technique relies on the use of a circular (Bessel) aperture and suppresses Cherenkov losses and surface-guided light modes by enforcing a momentum transfer selection. The technique also strongly suppresses the elastic zero loss peak, making the acquisition, interpretation and signal to noise ratio of low loss spectra considerably better, especially for excitations in the first few eV of the EELS spectrum. Simulations of the low loss inelastic electron scattering probabilities demonstrate the beneficial influence of the Bessel aperture in this setup even for high accelerating voltages. The importance of selecting the optimal experimental convergence and collection angles is highlighted. The effect of the created off-axis acquisition conditions on the selection of the transitions from valence to conduction bands is discussed in detail on a simplified isotropic two band model. This opens the opportunity for deliberately selecting certain transitions by carefully tuning the microscope parameters. The suggested approach is experimentally demonstrated and provides good signal to noise ratio and interpretable band gap signals on reference samples of diamond, GaN and AlN while offering spatial resolution in the nm range. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Condensed Matter Theory (CMT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 7
DOI: 10.1016/J.ULTRAMIC.2018.03.021
|
|
|
“Computational comparisons between the conventional multislice method and the third-order multislice method for calculating high-energy electron diffraction and imaging”. Chen JH, van Dyck D, op de Beeck M, van Landuyt J, Ultramicroscopy 69, 219 (1997)
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 11
|
|
|
“Inelastic scattering of high-energy electrons in a crystal in thermal equilibrium with the environment: 1: theoretical framework”. Fanidis C, van Dyck D, van Landuyt J, Ultramicroscopy 41, 55 (1992). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(92)90094-Z
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 17
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90094-Z
|
|
|
“In situ HREM study of electron irradiation effects in AgCl microcrystals”. Goessens C, Schryvers D, van Landuyt J, de Keyzer R, Ultramicroscopy 40, 151 (1992). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(92)90056-P
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 10
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90056-P
|
|
|
“Selective imaging of the “substructures&rdquo, in incommensurately modulated intergrowth crystal structures”. Milat O, Van Tendeloo G, Amelinckx S, Ultramicroscopy 41, 65 (1992). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(92)90095-2
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 5
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(92)90095-2
|
|
|
“Is atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy able to resolve and refine amorphous structures?”.van Dyck D, Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van den Bos A, Ultramicroscopy 98, 27 (2003). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00023-8
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 26
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00023-8
|
|
|
“Optimal experimental design of STEM measurement of atom column positions”. Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van Dyck D, van den Bos A, Ultramicroscopy 90, 273 (2002). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00152-8
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 35
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00152-8
|
|
|
“Does a monochromator improve the precision in quantitative HRTEM?”.den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S, van Dyck D, van den Bos A, Geuens P, Ultramicroscopy 89, 275 (2001). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00089-4
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 22
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00089-4
|
|
|
“Measuring the absolute position of EELS ionisation edges in a TEM”. Potapov PL, Schryvers D, Ultramicroscopy 99, 73 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00185-2
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 29
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00185-2
|
|
|
“Determination of the mean inner potential in III-V semiconductors, Si and Ge by density functional theory and electron holography”. Kruse P, Schowalter M, Lamoen D, Rosenauer A, Gerthsen D, Ultramicroscopy 106, 105 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.057
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron Microscopy for Materials Science (EMAT);
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 50
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.057
|
|
|
“Acquisition of the EELS data cube by tomographic reconstruction”. van den Broek W, Verbeeck J, de Backer S, Scheunders P, Schryvers D, Ultramicroscopy 106, 269 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.09.001
Abstract: Energy filtered TEM, EFTEM, provides three-dimensional data, two spatial and one spectral dimension. We propose to acquire these data by measuring a series of images with a defocused energy filter. It will be shown that each image is a projection of the data on the detector and that reconstruction of the data out of a sufficient number of such projections using a tomographic reconstruction algorithm is possible. This technique uses only a fraction of the electron dose an energy filtered series (EFS) needs for the same spectral and spatial resolution and the same mean signal-to-noise ratio. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 6
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.09.001
|
|
|
“Model based quantification of EELS spectra”. Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Ultramicroscopy 101, 207 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.06.004
Abstract: Recent advances in model based quantification of electron energy loss spectra (EELS) are reported. The maximum likelihood method for the estimation of physical parameters describing an EELS spectrum, the validation of the model used in this estimation procedure, and the computation of the attainable precision, that is, the theoretical lower bound on the variance of these estimates, are discussed. Experimental examples on An and GaAs samples show the power of the maximum likelihood method and show that the theoretical prediction of the attainable precision can be closely approached even for spectra with overlapping edges where conventional EELS quantification fails. To provide end-users with a low threshold alternative to conventional quantification, a user friendly program was developed which is freely available under a GNU public license. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 147
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.06.004
|
|
|
“Maximum likelihood estimation of structure parameters from high resolution electron microscopy images : part 2 : a practical example”. Van Aert S, den Dekker AJ, van den Bos A, van Dyck D, Chen JH, Ultramicroscopy 104, 107 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.002
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 37
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.002
|
|
|
“Plasmon holographic experiments: theoretical framework”. Verbeeck J, van Dyck D, Lichte H, Potapov P, Schattschneider P, Ultramicroscopy 102, 239 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.10.005
Abstract: A theoretical framework is described to understand the results of plasmon holography experiments leading to insight in the meaning of the experimental results and pointing out directions for future experiments. The framework is based on the formalism of mutual intensity to describe how coherence is transferred through an optical system. For the inelastic interaction with the object, an expression for the volume. plasmon excitations in a free electron gas is used as a model for the behaviour of aluminium. The formalism leads to a clear graphical intuitive tool for under-standing the experiments. It becomes evident that the measured coherence is solely related to the angular distribution of the plasmon scattering in the case of bulk plasmons. After describing the framework, the special case of coherence outside a spherical particle is treated and the seemingly controversial idea of a plasmon with a limited coherence length obtained front experiments is clarified. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 43
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.10.005
|
|
|
“Maximum likelihood estimation of structure parameters from high resolution electron microscopy images: part 1: a theoretical framework”. den Dekker AJ, Van Aert S, van den Bos A, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 104, 83 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.001
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 70
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.001
|
|
|
“Interpretation of “Energy-filtered electron-diffracted beam holography&rdquo, by R.A. Herring”. Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 106, 461 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.12.004
Abstract: A straightforward application of the theoretical framework presented by Verbeeck et al. [Ultramicroscopy 102 (2005) 239] is presented to explain the energy-filtered electron-diffracted beam holography experiments published by Herring [Ultramicroscopy 104 (2005) 261]. It is shown that the theory is in agreement with all experimental findings, which leads to the interpretation that the experiments are mainly measuring the angular coherence of the source image rather than exposing details on the coherence properties of inelastic scattering. A change in experimental parameters is proposed, which could result in interesting information about the coherence in all inelastic scattering process. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 8
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.12.004
|
|
|
“Quantification of crystalline and amorphous content in porous TiO2 samples from electron energy loss spectroscopy”. Bertoni G, Beyers E, Verbeeck J, Mertens M, Cool P, Vansant EF, Van Tendeloo G, Ultramicroscopy 106, 630 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.03.006
Abstract: We present an efficient method for the quantification of crystalline versus amorphous phase content in mesoporous materials, making use of electron energy loss spectroscopy. The method is based on fitting a superposition of core-loss edges using the maximum likelihood method with measured reference spectra. We apply the method to mesoporous TiO2 samples. We show that the absolute amount of the crystalline phase can be determined with an accuracy below 5%. This method takes also the amorphous phase into account, where standard X-ray diffraction is only quantitative for crystalline phases and not for amorphous phase. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Laboratory of adsorption and catalysis (LADCA)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 83
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.03.006
|
|
|
“Model-based quantification of EELS spectra: including the fine structure”. Verbeeck J, Van Aert S, Bertoni G, Ultramicroscopy 106, 976 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.006
Abstract: An extension to model-based electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) quantification is reported to improve the possibility of modelling fine structure changes in electron energy loss spectra. An equalisation function is used in the energy loss near edge structure (ELNES) region to model the differences between a single atom differential cross section and the cross section for an atom in a crystal. The equalisation function can be shown to approximate the relative density of unoccupied states for the given excitation edge. On a set of 200 experimental h-BN spectra, this technique leads to statistically acceptable models resulting into unbiased estimates of relative concentrations and making the estimated precisions come very close to the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB). The method greatly expands the useability of model-based EELS quantification to spectra with pronounced fine structure. Another benefit of this model is that one also gets an estimate of the unoccupied density of states for a given excitation edge, without having to do background removal and deconvolution, making the outcome intrinsically more reliable and less noisy. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 38
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.006
|
|
|
“Experiments on inelastic electron holography”. Potapov P, Lichte H, Verbeeck J, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 106, 1012 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.012
Abstract: Using the combination of an electron biprism and an energy filter, the coherence distribution in an inelastically scattered wave-field is measured. It is found that the degree of coherence decreases rapidly with increasing distance between two superimposed points in the object, and with increasing energy-loss. In a Si sample, coherence of plasmon scattering increases in vacuum with the distance from the edge of the sample. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 28
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.05.012
|
|
|
“Electron inelastic, scattering and anisotropy: the two-dimensional point of view”. Radtke G, Botton GA, Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 106, 1082 (2006). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.023
Abstract: The measurement of the electronic structure of anisotropic materials using energy loss near edge structure (ELNES) spectroscopy is an important field of microanalysis in transmission electron microscopy. We present a novel method to study the angular dependence of electron inelastic scattering in anisotropic materials. This method has been applied to the study of 1s -> pi* and sigma* transitions on the carbon K edge in pyrolitic graphite. An excellent agreement between experimental and theoretical two-dimensional scattering patterns has been found. In particular, the need of a fully relativistic calculation of the inelastic scattering cross-section to explain the experimental results is demonstrated. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 5
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.023
|
|
|
“Electron channelling based crystallography”. Van Aert S, Geuens P, van Dyck D, Kisielowski C, Jinschek JR, Ultramicroscopy 107, 551 (2007). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.031
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 32
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.031
|
|
|
“Nonlinear imaging using annular dark field TEM”. Bals S, Kilaas R, Kisielowski C, Ultramicroscopy 104, 281 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.05.004
Abstract: Annular dark field TEM images exhibit a dominant mass-thickness contrast that can be quantified to extract single atom scattering cross sections. On top of this incoherent background, additional lattice fringes appear with a nonlinear information limit of 1.2 angstrom at 150 kV. The formation of these fringes is described by coherent nonlinear imaging theory and good agreement is found between experimental and simulated images. Calculations furthermore predict that the use of aberration corrected microscopes will improve the image quality dramatically. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 15
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.05.004
|
|
|
“Model-based quantification of EELS spectra: treating the effect of correlated noise”. Verbeeck J, Bertoni G, Ultramicroscopy 108, 74 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.03.004
Abstract: Correlated noise is generally present in experimentally recorded electron energy loss spectra due to a non-ideal electron detector. In this contribution we describe a method to experimentally measure the noise properties of the detector as well as the consequences it has for model-based quantification using maximum likelihood. The effect of the correlated noise on the maximum likelihood fitting results can be shown to be negligible for the estimated (co)variance of the parameters while an experimentally obtained scaling factor is required to correct the likelihood ratio test for the reduction of noise power with frequency. Both effects are derived theoretically under a set of approximations and tested for a range of signal-to-noise values using numerical experiments. Finally, an experimental example shows that the correction for correlated noise is essential and should always be included in the fitting procedure. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 16
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2007.03.004
|
|
|
“Inelastic scattering of high-energy electrons in a crystal in thermal equilibrium with the environment: part 2: solution of the equations and applications to concrete cases”. Fanidis C, van Dyck D, van Landuyt J, Ultramicroscopy 48, 133 (1993)
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 6
|
|
|
“Electron diffraction effects of conical, helically wound, graphite whiskers”. Luyten W, Krekels T, Amelinckx S, Van Tendeloo G, van Dyck D, van Landuyt J, Ultramicroscopy 49, 123 (1993). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(93)90219-N
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 14
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(93)90219-N
|
|
|
“Selective imaging of sublattices in complex structures”. Amelinckx S, Milat O, Van Tendeloo G, Ultramicroscopy 51, 90 (1993). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(93)90138-N
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 8
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(93)90138-N
|
|
|
“Structures and phase transitions in C60 and C70 fullerites”. Van Tendeloo G, Amelinckx S, Muto S, Verheijen MA, van Loosdrecht PHM, Meijer G, Ultramicroscopy 51, 168 (1993). http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(93)90145-N
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.436
Times cited: 17
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(93)90145-N
|
|
|
“Accuracy and precision in model based EELS quantification”. Bertoni G, Verbeeck J, Ultramicroscopy 108, 782 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.01.004
Abstract: We present results on model based quantification of electron energy loss spectra (EELS), focusing on the factors that influence accuracy and precision in determining chemical concentrations. Several sources of systematical errors are investigated. The spectrometer entrance aperture determines the collection angle, and the effects of its position with respect to the transmitted beam are investigated, taking into account the diffraction by the crystal structure. The effect of the orientation of the sample is tested experimentally and theoretically on SrTiO3, and finally, a simulated experiment on c-BN at different thicknesses confirms the superior results of the model based method with respect to the conventional method. A test on a set of experimental reference compounds is presented, showing that remarkably good accuracy can be obtained. Recommendations are given to achieve high accuracy and precision in practice. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 44
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.01.004
|
|