“EPMA and µ-SRXRF analysis and TEM-based microstructure characterization of a set of Roman glass fragments”. Fredrickx P, de Ryck I, Janssens K, Schryvers D, Petit J-P, Döcking H, X-ray spectrometry 33, 326 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.734
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 13
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.734
|
“Characterization of a polycapillary lens for use in micro-XANES experiments”. Proost K, Vincze L, Janssens K, Gao N, Bulska E, Schreiner M, Falkenberg G, X-ray spectrometry 32, 215 (2003). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.635
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 50
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.635
|
“Reconstruction of the three-dimensional distribution of elements in fly-ash particles by micro-XRF spectroscopy”. Rindby A, Janssens K, Osán J, X-ray spectrometry 32, 248 (2003). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.647
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 8
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.647
|
“Comparative material characterization of historical and industrial samples by using a compact micro-XRF spectrometer”. Bichlmeier S, Janssens K, Heckel J, Hoffmann P, Ortner HM, X-ray spectrometry 31, 87 (2002). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.563
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 12
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.563
|
“Component selection for a compact micro-XRF spectrometer”. Bichlmeier S, Janssens K, Heckel J, Gibson D, Hoffmann P, Ortner HM, X-ray spectrometry 30, 8 (2001). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.457
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 33
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.457
|
“ID18F: a new micro-X-ray fluorescence end-station at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF): preliminary results”. Somogyi A, Drakopoulos M, Vincze L, Vekemans B, Camerani C, Janssens K, Snigirev A, Adams F, X-ray spectrometry 30, 242 (2001). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.494.ABS
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 76
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.494.ABS
|
“Use of microscopic XRF for non-destructive analysis in art an archaeometry”. Janssens K, Vittiglio G, Deraedt I, Aerts A, Vekemans B, Vincze L, Wei F, de Ryck I, Schalm O, Adams F, Rindby A, Knöchel A, Simionovici AS, Snigirev A, X-ray spectrometry 29, 73 (2000). http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(200001/02)29:1<73::AID-XRS416>3.3.CO;2-D
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(200001/02)29:1<73::AID-XRS416>3.3.CO;2-D
|
“Automated segmentation of μ-XRF image sets”. Vekemans B, Janssens K, Vincze L, Aerts A, Adams F, Hertogen J, X-ray spectrometry 26, 333 (1997)
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
|
“Interpreting technical evidence from spectral imaging of paintings by Edouard Manet in the Courtauld Gallery”. Amato SR, Burnstock A, Cross M, Janssens K, Rosi F, Cartechini L, Fontana R, Dal Fovo A, Paolantoni M, Grazia C, Romani A, Michelin A, Andraud C, Tournie A, Dik J, X-ray spectrometry
T2 –, MA-XRF Workshop on Developments and Applications of Macro-XRF in, Conservation, Art, and Archeology, SEP 24-25, 2017, Trieste, ITALY 48, 282 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.2828
Abstract: The paintings by edouard Manet in The Courtauld Gallery Dejeuner sur l'herbe (1863-68), Marguerite de Conflans en Toilette de Bal (1870-1880), Banks of the Seine at Argenteuil (1874), and A Bar at the Folies-Bergere (1882) were investigated for the first time using a range of non-invasive in situ analyses. The aims of the study were to investigate the painting techniques and materials used for this group of works and to critically evaluate the technical evidence derived from the integrated use of imaging techniques and portable spectroscopic methods in this context. The paintings were investigated by means of macro X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF), reflection spectral imaging, portable UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy, portable Raman spectroscopy, and reflection FTIR. MA-XRF and reflection spectral imaging allowed visualising elements in the compositions that were not visible using traditional methods of technical study. For example, MA-XRF analysis of Dejeuner sur l'herbe revealed elements of the development of the composition that provided new evidence to consider its relationship to other versions of the composition. The study also highlighted questions about the interpretation of elemental distribution maps and spectral images that did not correspond to the reworking visible in X-radiographs. For example, in A Bar at the Folies-Bergere Manet made numerous changes during painting, which were not clearly visualised with any of the techniques used. The research has wider implications for the study of Impressionist paintings, as the results will support technical studies of works by other artists of the period who used similar materials and painting methods.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.2828
|
“Preface to the special issue on: MA-XRF “developments and applications of macro-XRF in conservation, art, and archeology&rdquo, (Trieste, Italy, 24 and 25 September 2017)”. Romano FP, Janssens K, X-ray spectrometry 48, 249 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.3047
Keywords: Editorial; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.3047
|
“Study of the uniformity of aerosol filters by scanning MA-XRF”. Cabal A, Legrand S, Van den Bril B, Tote K, Janssens K, van Espen P, X-ray spectrometry
T2 –, 17th European Conference on X-Ray Spectrometry (EXRS), JUN 19-24, 2016, Univ Gothenburg, Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SWEDEN 46, 461 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1002/XRS.2767
Abstract: Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is an attractive analytical method to determine the level of air pollution by heavy metals. The concentration of the filter in ng/cm(2) is obtained by direct comparison of the net characteristic line intensity of an element with that of a thin film standard. As the sampled area on the filter and the area of the standard are larger than the area analysed by the instrument, the distribution of the elements on the surface of both samples and standards have to be sufficiently uniform. If this is not the case, biased concentration estimates are obtained. Two scanning macro-XRF setups with a beam diameter of similar to 0.5 mm were used to investigate the distribution of elements in (1) commercially available (Micromatter) standards, (2) in-house quartz filter standards obtained with an aerosol generator and (3) particulatematter (PM10) collected on quartz filters by a Leckel SEQ 47/50 sampler. The uniformity of the Micromatter standards was better than 2%. At least some in-house standards showed a concave distribution with less material at the edges. The maximum bias introduced by this is less than 5%. Because of the limited sensitivity of scanning XRF compared with conventional XRF, the distribution of only a few common elements like Ca and Fe could be determined reliably in aerosol filters. The distribution of some heavy elements could only be measured in filters sampled in polluted regions. In general, the loading of particulate matter over the filters was uniform. Copyright (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; AXES (Antwerp X-ray Analysis, Electrochemistry and Speciation)
Impact Factor: 1.298
Times cited: 4
DOI: 10.1002/XRS.2767
|