|
|
“Phase boundaries of superconducting mesoscopic square loops”. Fomin VM, Misko VR, Devreese JT, Moshchalkov VV, 12th International Conference on the Electronic Properties of Two-Dimensional Systems (EP2DS), Tokyo, 835 (1997)
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron Microscopy for Materials Science (EMAT);
|
|
|
|
“2-D rotational invariant multi sub band Schrödinger-Poisson solver to model nanowire transistors”. Sels D, Sorée B, Groeseneken G, 14th International Workshop on Computational Electronics, 85 (2010)
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron Microscopy for Materials Science (EMAT);
|
|
|
|
“Enhanced landfill mining at the REMO site : assessing stakeholders' perspectives for implementation”. Einhäupl P, Krook J, Svensson N, Van Acker K, Van Passel S, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Enhanced Landfill Mining, February 5-6, 2018, Mechelen, Belgium / Jones, Peter Tom [edit.], Machiels, Lieven [edit.] (2018)
Keywords: P3 Proceeding; Engineering sciences. Technology; Engineering Management (ENM)
|
|
|
|
“Integrating PV+battery residential microgrids in distribution networks : how is the point of common coupling agreed upon?”.Saviuc I, Van Passel S, Peremans H in Sustainable Energy for Smart Cities : First EAI International Conference, SESC 2019, Braga, Portugal, December 4–6, 2019: proceedings, page 150 (2020).
Abstract: The anticipated development of decentralized electricity generation is expected to strengthen the opportunities of prosumers in the residential areas of cities, in line with the predicted establishment of renewable energy generation and storage. Based on academic research and on successful case studies, the opportunity for residential prosumers to organize in microgrids emerges as a viable and promising solution. This paper focuses on microgrids that are planned to generate electricity with a PV unit and use a shared storage system, and that opt to have a connection with the main grid. However, the point of common coupling needs to be agreed first between the microgrid operator and the network operator, and this agreement is determined by several factors and conditions beyond the basic technical and regulatory requirements. A survey of academic literature on the determinant factors for such an agreement exposes the fact that current research either focuses on the integration of individual prosumers in the main grid, or regards the point of common coupling as a given component of microgrids. We argue that neither of the two approaches is helpful in the case of microgrids vs. main grid, seeing as the agreement is not self-evident under just any circumstances, nor can the microgrid be equated to a single, large prosumer. Therefore this short paper compiles a set of determinant factors for the microgrid integration, as they emerge from academic literature, with the aim to document further research needs and support the discussion on microgrid integration.
Keywords: H1 Book chapter; Economics; Engineering sciences. Technology; Engineering Management (ENM)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45694-8_12
|
|
