|   | 
Details
   web
Records
Author Longo, R.; Ferrarotti, M.; Garcia Sánchez, C.; Derudi, M.; Parente, A.
Title Advanced turbulence models and boundary conditions for flows around different configurations of ground-mounted buildings Type A1 Journal article
Year (down) 2017 Publication Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics Abbreviated Journal J Wind Eng Ind Aerod
Volume 167 Issue Pages 160-182
Keywords A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Abstract When dealing with Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) simulations, commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) acquires a strategic resonance. Thanks to its good compromise between accuracy of results and calculation time, RANS still represents a valid alternative to more resource-demanding methods. However, focusing on the models' performances in urban studies, LES generally outmatches RANS results, even if the former is at least one order of magnitude more expensive. Consequently, the present work aims to propose a variety of approaches meant to solve some of the major problems linked to RANS simulations and to further improve its accuracy in typical urban contexts. All of these models are capable of switching from an undisturbed flux formulation to a disturbed one through a local deviation or a marker function. For undisturbed flows, a comprehensive approach is adopted, solving the issue of the erroneous stream-wise gradients affecting the turbulent profiles. Around obstacles, Non-Linear Eddy-Viscosity closures are adopted, due to their prominent capability in capturing the anisotropy of turbulence. The purpose of this work is then to propose a new Building Influence Area concept and to offer more affordable alternatives to LES simulations without sacrificing a good grade of accuracy.
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Amsterdam Editor
Language Wos 000405766600013 Publication Date 2017-05-02
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN 0167-6105 ISBN Additional Links UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles
Impact Factor 2.049 Times cited 9 Open Access Not_Open_Access
Notes ; ; Approved Most recent IF: 2.049
Call Number UA @ lucian @ c:irua:145191 Serial 4713
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Ercolani, G.; Gorle, C.; Garcia Sánchez, C.; Corbari, C.; Mancini, M.
Title RAMS and WRF sensitivity to grid spacing in large-eddy simulations of the dry convective boundary layer Type A1 Journal article
Year (down) 2015 Publication Computers and fluids Abbreviated Journal Comput Fluids
Volume 123 Issue 123 Pages 54-71
Keywords A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Abstract Large-eddy simulations (LESS) are frequently used to model the planetary boundary layer, and the choice of the grid cell size, numerical schemes and sub grid model can significantly influence the simulation results. In the present paper the impact of grid spacing on LES of an idealized atmospheric convective boundary layer (CBL), for which the statistics and flow structures are well understood, is assessed for two mesoscale models: the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) and the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF). Nine simulations are performed on a fixed computational domain (6 x 6 x 2 km), combining three different horizontal (120, 60, 30 m) and vertical (20, 10, 5 m) spacings. The impact of the cell size on the CBL is investigated by comparing turbulence statistics and velocity spectra. The results demonstrate that both WRF and RAMS can perform LES of the CBL under consideration without requiring extremely high computational loads, but they also indicate the importance of adopting a computational grid that is adequate for the numerical schemes and subgrid models used. In both RAMS and WRF a horizontal cell size of 30 m is required to obtain a suitable turbulence reproduction throughout the CBL height. Considering the vertical grid spacing, WRF produced similar results for all the three tested values, while in RAMS it should be ensured that the aspect ratio of the cells does not exceed a value of 3. The two models were found to behave differently in function of the grid resolution, and they have different shortcomings in their prediction of CBL turbulence. WRF exhibits enhanced damping at the smallest scales, while RAMS is prone to the appearance of spurious fluctuations in the flow when the grid aspect ratio is too high. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Oxford Editor
Language Wos 000365367500006 Publication Date 2015-10-08
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN 0045-7930 ISBN Additional Links UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles
Impact Factor 2.313 Times cited 3 Open Access
Notes Approved Most recent IF: 2.313; 2015 IF: 1.619
Call Number UA @ lucian @ c:irua:130200 Serial 4236
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Gorle, C.; Garcia Sánchez, C.; Iaccarino, G.
Title Quantifying inflow and RANS turbulence model form uncertainties for wind engineering flows Type A1 Journal article
Year (down) 2015 Publication Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics T2 – 6th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE), JUN 08-12, 2014, Hamburg, GERMANY Abbreviated Journal J Wind Eng Ind Aerod
Volume 144 Issue 144 Pages 202-212
Keywords A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)
Abstract Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations are often used in the wind engineering practice for the analysis of turbulent bluff body flows. An approach that allows identifying the uncertainty related to the use of reduced-order turbulence models in RANS simulations would significantly increase the confidence in the use of simulation results as a basis for design decisions. In the present study we apply a strategy that enables quantifying these uncertainties by introducing perturbations in the Reynolds stress tensor to simulations of the flow in downtown Oklahoma City. The method is combined with a framework to quantify uncertainties in the inflow wind direction and intensity, and the final result of the UQ approach is compared to field measurement data for the velocity at 13 locations in the downtown area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Elsevier science bv Place of Publication Amsterdam Editor
Language Wos 000360874900023 Publication Date 2015-08-18
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN 0167-6105 ISBN Additional Links UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles
Impact Factor 2.049 Times cited 22 Open Access
Notes Approved Most recent IF: 2.049; 2015 IF: 1.414
Call Number UA @ lucian @ c:irua:127843 Serial 4230
Permanent link to this record