|
|
“Precision of three-dimensional atomic scale measurements from HRTEM images : what are the limits?”.Wang A, Van Aert S, Goos P, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 114, 20 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.12.002
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate to what extent high resolution transmission electron microscopy images can be used to measure the mass, in terms of thickness, and surface profile, corresponding to the defocus offset, of an object at the atomic scale. Therefore, we derive an expression for the statistical precision with which these object parameters can be estimated in a quantitative analysis. Evaluating this expression as a function of the microscope settings allows us to derive the optimal microscope design. Acquiring three-dimensional structure information in terms of thickness turns out to be much more difficult than obtaining two-dimensional information on the projected atom column positions. The attainable precision is found to be more strongly affected by processes influencing the image contrast, such as phonon scattering, than by the specific choice of microscope settings. For a realistic incident electron dose, it is expected that atom columns can be distinguished with single atom sensitivity up to a thickness of the order of the extinction distance. A comparable thickness limit is determined to measure surface steps of one atom. An increase of the electron dose shifts the limiting thickness upward due to an increase in the signal-to-noise ratio.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM); Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 5
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.12.002
|
|
|
|
“Model-based electron microscopy : from images toward precise numbers for unknown structure parameters”. Van Aert S, van den Broek W, Goos P, van Dyck D, Micron 43, 509 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.10.019
Abstract: Statistical parameter estimation theory is proposed as a method to quantify electron microscopy images. It aims at obtaining precise and accurate values for the unknown structure parameters including, for example, atomic column positions and types. In this theory, observations are purely considered as data planes, from which structure parameters have to be determined using a parametric model describing the images. The method enables us to measure positions of atomic columns with a precision of the order of a few picometers even though the resolution of the electron microscope is one or two orders of magnitude larger. Moreover, small differences in averaged atomic number, which cannot be distinguished visually, can be quantified using high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy images. Finally, it is shown how to optimize the experimental design so as to attain the highest precision. As an example, the optimization of the probe size for nanoparticle radius measurements is considered. It is also shown how to quantitatively balance signal-to-noise ratio and resolution by adjusting the probe size.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM); Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 1.98
Times cited: 7
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.10.019
|
|
|
|
“Throughput maximization of particle radius measurements by balancing size and current of the electron probe”. van den Broek W, Van Aert S, Goos P, van Dyck D, Ultramicroscopy 111, 940 (2011). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.025
Abstract: In thispaperweinvestigatewhichprobesizemaximizesthethroughputwhenmeasuringtheradiusof nanoparticlesinhighangleannulardarkfieldscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscopy(HAADFSTEM). The sizeandthecorrespondingcurrentoftheelectronprobedeterminetheprecisionoftheestimateofa particlesradius.Maximizingthroughputmeansthatamaximumnumberofparticlesshouldbeimaged withinagiventimeframe,sothataprespecifiedprecisionisattained.WeshowthatBayesianstatistical experimentaldesignisaveryusefulapproachtodeterminetheoptimalprobesizeusingacertainamount of priorknowledgeaboutthesample.Thedependenceoftheoptimalprobesizeonthedetectorgeometry and thediameter,variabilityandatomicnumberoftheparticlesisinvestigated.Anexpressionforthe optimalprobesizeintheabsenceofanykindofpriorknowledgeaboutthespecimenisderivedaswell.
Keywords: A1 Journal article; Engineering Management (ENM); Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT); Vision lab
Impact Factor: 2.843
Times cited: 7
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.025
|
|
