| |
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Dubois, M.; Hoogmartens, R.; Van Passel, S.; Van Acker, K.; Vanderreydt, I. |
|
| |
Title |
Innovative market-based policy instruments for waste management : a case study on shredder residues in Belgium |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| |
Year  |
2015 |
Publication |
Waste Management & Research |
Abbreviated Journal |
Waste Manage Res |
|
| |
Volume |
33 |
Issue |
10 |
Pages |
886-893 |
|
| |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics; Engineering Management (ENM) |
|
| |
Abstract |
In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs. |
|
| |
Address |
|
|
| |
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
| |
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
|
| |
Language |
|
Wos |
000361818000004 |
Publication Date |
2015-09-22 |
|
| |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
| |
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
| |
ISSN |
0734-242x; 1096-3669 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record |
|
| |
Impact Factor |
1.803 |
Times cited |
1 |
Open Access |
|
|
| |
Notes |
; The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research has been funded by the Flemish Government through the policy research centres programme. ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 1.803; 2015 IF: 1.297 |
|
| |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:129876 |
Serial |
6217 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Hoogmartens, R.; Van Passel, S.; Van Acker, K.; Dubois, M. |
|
| |
Title |
Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| |
Year |
2014 |
Publication |
Environmental Impact Assessment Review |
Abbreviated Journal |
Environ Impact Asses |
|
| |
Volume |
48 |
Issue |
|
Pages |
27-33 |
|
| |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Economics; Engineering Management (ENM) |
|
| |
Abstract |
Increasing interest in sustainability has led to the development of sustainability assessment tools such as Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). Due to methodological disparity of these three tools, conflicting assessment results generate confusion for many policy and business decisions. In order to interpret and integrate assessment results, the paper provides a framework that clarifies the connections and coherence between the included assessment methodologies. Building on this framework, the paper further focuses on key aspects to adapt any of the methodologies to full sustainability assessments. Aspects dealt with in the review are for example the reported metrics, the scope, data requirements, discounting, product- or project-related and approaches with respect to scarcity and labor requirements. In addition to these key aspects, the review shows that important connections exist: (i) the three tools can cope with social inequality, (ii) processes such as valuation techniques for LCC and CBA are common, (iii) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is used as input in both LCA and CBA and (iv) LCA can be used in parallel with LCC. Furthermore, the most integrated sustainability approach combines elements of LCA and LCC to achieve the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). The key aspects and the connections referred to in the review are illustrated with a case study on the treatment of end-of-life automotive glass. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
|
| |
Address |
|
|
| |
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
| |
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
|
| |
Language |
|
Wos |
000340141900004 |
Publication Date |
2014-05-23 |
|
| |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
| |
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
| |
ISSN |
0195-9255 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
|
| |
Impact Factor |
3.094 |
Times cited |
93 |
Open Access |
|
|
| |
Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 3.094; 2014 IF: 2.400 |
|
| |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:127542 |
Serial |
6163 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Van Passel, S.; Dubois, M.; Eyckmans, J.; de Gheldere, S.; Ang, F.; Jones, P.T.; Van Acker, K. |
|
| |
Title |
The economics of enhanced landfill mining : private and societal performance drivers |
Type |
A1 Journal article |
| |
Year |
2013 |
Publication |
Journal Of Cleaner Production |
Abbreviated Journal |
J Clean Prod |
|
| |
Volume |
55 |
Issue |
|
Pages |
92-102 |
|
| |
Keywords |
A1 Journal article; Engineering sciences. Technology; Engineering Management (ENM) |
|
| |
Abstract |
This paper addresses the economics of Enhanced Landfill Mining (ELFM) both from a private point of view as well as from a society perspective. The private potential is assessed using a case study for which an investment model is developed to identify the impact of a broad range of parameters on the profitability of ELFM. We found that especially variations in Waste-to-Energy (WtE efficiency, electricity price, CO2-price, WtE investment and operational costs) and ELFM support explain the variation in economic profitability measured by the Internal Rate of Return. To overcome site-specific parameters we also evaluated the regional ELFM potential for the densely populated and industrial region of Flanders (north of Belgium). The total number of potential ELFM sites was estimated using a 5-step procedure and a simulation tool was developed to trade-off private costs and benefits. The analysis shows that there is a substantial economic potential for ELFM projects on the wider regional level. Furthermore, this paper also reviews the costs and benefits from a broader perspective. The carbon footprint of the case study was mapped in order to assess the project's net impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Also the impacts of nature restoration, soil remediation, resource scarcity and reduced import dependence were valued so that they can be used in future social cost-benefit analysis. Given the complex trade-off between economic, social and environmental issues of ELFM projects, we conclude that further refinement of the methodological framework and the development of the integrated decision tools supporting private and public actors, are necessary. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
|
| |
Address |
|
|
| |
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
| |
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
|
| |
Language |
|
Wos |
000322802300010 |
Publication Date |
2012-04-20 |
|
| |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
| |
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
| |
ISSN |
0959-6526 |
ISBN |
|
Additional Links |
UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles |
|
| |
Impact Factor |
5.715 |
Times cited |
65 |
Open Access |
|
|
| |
Notes |
; ; |
Approved |
Most recent IF: 5.715; 2013 IF: 3.590 |
|
| |
Call Number |
UA @ admin @ c:irua:127550 |
Serial |
6266 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
