NANOlab Center of Excellence literature database -- Query Results

“Standard Practices of Reticular Chemistry”. Gropp C, Canossa S, Wuttke S, Gándara F, Li Q, Gagliardi L, Yaghi OM, Acs Central Science 6, 1255 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00592 Abstract: Since 1995 when the first of metal−organic frameworks was crystallized with the strong bond approach, where metal ions are joined by charged organic linkers exemplified by carboxylates, followed by proof of their porosity in 1998 and ultrahigh porosity in 1999, a revolution in the development of their chemistry has ensued. This is being reinforced by the discovery of two- and three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks in 2005 and 2007. Currently, the chemistry of such porous, crystalline frameworks is collectively referred to as reticular chemistry, which is being practiced in over 100 countries. The involvement of researchers from various backgrounds and fields, and the vast scope of this chemistry and its societal applications, necessitate articulating the “Standard Practices of Reticular Chemistry”. Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT) Impact Factor: 18.2 DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00592 Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles show.php?record=6423
“Pore Chemistry of Metal–Organic Frameworks”. Ji Z, Wang H, Canossa S, Wuttke S, Yaghi OM, Advanced Functional Materials 30, 2000238 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000238 Abstract: The pores in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) can be functionalized by placing chemical entities along the backbone and within the backbone. This chemistry is enabled by the architectural, thermal, and chemical robustness of the frameworks and the ability to characterize them by many diffraction and spectroscopic techniques. The pore chemistry of MOFs is articulated in terms of site isolation, coupling, and cooperation and relate that to their functions in guest recognition, catalysis, ion and electron transport, energy transfer, pore‐dynamic modulation, and interface construction. It is envisioned that the ultimate control of pore chemistry requires arranging functionalities into defined sequences and developing techniques for reading and writing such sequences within the pores. Keywords: A1 Journal article; Engineering sciences. Technology; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT) Impact Factor: 19 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202000238 Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles show.php?record=6422

Abstract: Since 1995 when the first of metal−organic frameworks was crystallized with the strong bond approach, where metal ions are joined by charged organic linkers exemplified by carboxylates, followed by proof of their porosity in 1998 and ultrahigh porosity in 1999, a revolution in the development of their chemistry has ensued. This is being reinforced by the discovery of two- and three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks in 2005 and 2007. Currently, the chemistry of such porous, crystalline frameworks is collectively referred to as reticular chemistry, which is being practiced in over 100 countries. The involvement of researchers from various backgrounds and fields, and the vast scope of this chemistry and its societal applications, necessitate articulating the “Standard Practices of Reticular Chemistry”.

Keywords: A1 Journal article; Electron microscopy for materials research (EMAT)

Impact Factor: 18.2

DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00592

Additional Links: UA library record; WoS full record; WoS citing articles

show.php?record=6423

Abstract: The pores in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) can be functionalized by placing chemical entities along the backbone and within the backbone. This chemistry is enabled by the architectural, thermal, and chemical robustness of the frameworks and the ability to characterize them by many diffraction and spectroscopic techniques. The pore chemistry of MOFs is articulated in terms of site isolation, coupling, and cooperation and relate that to their functions in guest recognition, catalysis, ion and electron transport, energy transfer, pore‐dynamic modulation, and interface construction. It is envisioned that the ultimate control of pore chemistry requires arranging functionalities into defined sequences and developing techniques for reading and writing such sequences within the pores.